October 2007


Last updated on October 1, 2007. Please check back later for additions.

Contents

The Cinema Lounge
Arabian Sights
My Kid Could Paint That: Q&A with Director Amir Bar-Lev
Writer-Director Tony Gilroy on Michael Clayton
The 35th Annual Telluride Film Festival
We Need to Hear From You
Calendar of Events

A printer-friendly version.



The Cinema Lounge

The next meeting of the Cinema Lounge will be on Monday, October 8 at 7:00pm. The topic is "Supernatural movies: How can the limits be pushed further?"

The Cinema Lounge, a film discussion group, meets the second Monday of every month at 7:00pm at
Barnes and Noble, 555 12th St., NW in Washington, DC (near the Metro Center Metro stop).

Last month at Cinema Lounge
The September meeting highlighted the upcoming fall films and reviewed the summer movies. The group discussed their pleasure at seeing Ratatouille with one person commenting, "I liked the rat better than the cars," a reference to Transformers. We also discussed and compared the 2003 film Finding Nemo to Ratatouille: "I thought Nemo was going to be disappointing, thinking I could not identify with a fish." And "I liked the way the rat came to life. Even its fur moved." Among the comments made in talking about the various film studios, were "Pixar makes a commitment to improve with each film." Next is WALL-E, set for release in late June 2008. "Warner Brothers used to be gritty. Universal was about horror. Fox featured women's films. MGM made musicals. Pixar and Bruckheimer seem to be the only companies keeping their niche."

Some movies have "frontloadedness," a term referencing the early buzz of a film. It's a concept used for the upcoming Iron Man, an MTV release. Nancy Drew seemed to have bad timing, a film that should probably have been released in the fall. A few of people liked Breach. Others mentioned that current films are quite violent, including Death Sentence. "Shoot-'em up films are best to watch at night," said another. In watching 3:10 to Yuma "I was so immersed in it. The tension kept going, even sitting still. I felt chased. The ending, though, takes a long time to understand (its writing was weak). However, the actors and director were great."

Anticipated films include Jesse James although there is an apparent problem with the distributor, and Lust, Caution, an NC-17 film by Ang Lee. Predictions for bombs included Across the Universe, Mr. Magorium's Wonder Emporium, Alvin and the Chipmunks, Good Luck Chuck, and Beowulf. Everyone agreed that Spiderman 3 was poorly done--inconsistent with the comic and badly written with too many villains. "Even the sandman blew away. How interesting was that? It was like a WWE battle royal. That movie ruined by summer. I won't ever again automatically buy a ticket," groused one dissatisfied moviegoer. People liked Bourne Ultimatum but noted that the marketing was bad for Black Snake Moan even though Cinema Lounge appreciated the director and main actor appearing for an event. "The chain was too big in the movie posters. Plus the blues music angle was downplayed too much."



12th Year for Arabian Sights!

Contemporary Arab Cinema Takes the Screen

The finest in Contemporary Arab Cinema will once again engage and enchant audiences as part of the Arabian Sights Film Festival to take place Friday, October 26 through Sunday, November 4, 2007.

Presented by the Washington, DC International Film Festival, Arabian Sights will offer film enthusiasts a rare opportunity to see twelve new poignant features, documentaries and nine short films from the Arab world, including Egypt, Lebanon, Palestine, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia as well as the first feature film to come out of Oman. An Audience Award for most popular film will be presented.

The films will reflect the innovative perspectives of the Arab, Arab-American, and international film directors in the sometimes-controversial issues dealing with women, religion and politics.

The critically acclaimed Lebanese film Caramel, which was among the highlight films at the Cannes and Toronto Film Festivals, will open Arabian Sights at 6:30 pm on October 26 at the Avalon Theatre.

Several directors will be in attendance to answer questions and offer further insight into their work. Arabian Sights is pleased to welcome Dr. Jack Shaheen, film expert and author of the insightful book, Reel Bad Arabs, Khalid al Zadjali, director of the Omani feature Al Boum, Nicole Ballivian, director of Driving to Zigzigland, Bashar Da’as, star of Driving to Zigzigland and Nabil Abou-Harb, director of Arab in America.

“This year’s Arabian Sights highlights new and provocative films from the Arab world, heightens interest and awareness of Arab film, and emphasizes the diversity, creativity and artistic expression which is evident in all these exceptional films,” explained Shirin Ghareeb, festival director.

Major sponsors for the Arabian Sights Film Festival include The DC Commission on the Arts and Humanities; Center for the Global South, American University; The Mosaic Foundation; Center for Contemporary Arab Studies, Georgetown University; The Jerusalem Fund; American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee; Sultan Qaboos Cultural Center; The Georgetown Design Group, Inc; The Embassy of France; DC Internationals and Ross Kaplan.

Tickets for most screenings are $9 and a Festival Pass of 10 tickets is available for $81; advance tickets will be available on the website and day-of at the door. All screenings (with the exception of Opening Night will take place at the AMC Loews Dupont Circle 5, located at 1350 19th St., NW. For more information and a complete schedule visit
the website or call 202-724-5613.



My Kid Could Paint That: Q&A with Director Amir Bar-Lev

By Diane Svenonius, DC Film Society Member

A preview screening of My Kid Could Paint That took place on September 12 at Landmark's Bethesda Row Theater. Director Amir Bar-Lev took questions from the audience; DC Film Society Director Michael Kyrioglou moderated.

Amir Bar-Lev: You were all laughing and groaning at all the right times. You're good -- you get to know audiences when you do screenings.
Michael Kyrioglou: What did we miss at the end of the film? In an attempt to get the lights on and the credits up just now, we cut off the sound and missed some key information.
ABL: In an epilogue, you hear an excerpt from a Charles Gibson follow-up story about Marla. He says-- I think I remember the words-- “Her paintings are now going for $12,000. Just wait till she gets to be 12!” We heard the broadcast after the film was done and added it at the end. It demonstrates that her paintings continue to sell and the prices are higher.

MK: How did this story become something you wanted to pursue as a documentary film?
ABL: I read the New York Times story. By the way, I was a skeptic then about modern art, it seemed to me to be a hoax. I’m interested in what the story says about media fame and partly the idea of a prodigy. We’re used to a prodigy in music, a prodigy in chess. There are standards by which you can judge that. But there don’t seem to be objective standards in abstract art. It’s curious when you say a kid is a “prodigy” in abstract art. By the way, I’m less skeptical about modern art now. Apart from the question of the “scam”, it doesn’t mean I can’t make up my own mind and engage with the painting.

That’s the film I set out to make. A lot of the popular idea of modern art was that it was like a child’s painting. I went up there to Binghamton and tried to get into talking to her about representation, how she was working, and of course that wasn’t possible. Then the hoax story came out. I didn’t want to be a character in the documentary, I tried not to be in the frame. But it was ridiculous, I was “in the frame.” She’d ask me to intervene if Zane had a toy she wanted. Like (whispers) “I’m not here”. But I was there, leaning over the cameraman. I stopped to think about the “fly on the wall”--are we really flies on the wall in documentary? And I thought about where the story was going versus where the family wanted the story to go.

MK: I’m curious about the setup. Were there particular times of day when she was painting? The father seemed more involved in the painting and the mother less involved. Were they both always there, was someone always there?
ABL: I think she mostly painted in the morning. And someone was always there. The notion I went into it with was that I would find a four- year-old in a dark room, smoking, like Jackson Pollock, and ask what she thought about what she was doing. Of course that was wrong. That was how the media was reporting on her, hoax or no hoax. Incidentally, that’s a great way to do a documentary: do a 90 minute film on something the media has done. We get 90% of our information from news soundbits that always give you a different view from the actual.

A good example—the Town of Binghampton inserted bits in almost every TV show. Their tag was: “Binghamton! Not the place you’d expect to find abstract art!” and they’d always show the same shots of an abandoned factory, empty street, train tracks going off into the distance. They never panned to the left to show the university, the cafe, the gay neighborhood. The same tropes over and over can easily impact and you see a caricature of the subject. I don’t want the film to be seen as an attack on documentary films. This is part of the nature of any medium. For instance that couch scene was 2½ hours long. I’m not going to show an audience 2½ hours. I show two minutes. There’s a mediating factor for any storytelling device. But you can point it out a little.

It kind of helped me with my skepticism about art that there were three hours of film of Michael Kimmelman. (I could have made several films out of that three hours- it was interesting). One thing he explained was that that’s what Pollock and others were getting at in modern art. They were pointing to the act of painting. Abstract art tries to erase the role of the painter. In a documentary you try to erase the role of the filmmaker. I understood why Pollock wanted to put out a cigarette in the painting.

Question: As an art historian I didn’t find the art compelling. But the thing that wasn’t mentioned is that they’re investing an awful lot of money in getting the little girl to paint. Those are thirty dollar bottles of paint she’s sloshing around.
ABL: The best quote on that was when the father says “The paper was a little limiting for her so I gave her a canvas.”

Q: She didn’t really seem involved in the painting. But does it have to be black and white--either it’s by her or it’s not? If you sit her in front of the same painting twenty days in a row, you will get that layered effect. But someone has to do that-- put her there.
MK: I thought it was very revealing to see the paintings side by side, particularly the two that were painted for the camera, compared to others. It seemed that some of the paintings seemed to carry out ideas, have more consistency. It seemed that a different hand was involved in them. Let’s have a show of hands. How many people think that the paintings were done completely by the child? And how many believe someone else contributed?
ABL: I can’t tell you how gratifying it is after having been confused for two years that my confusion is coming out in the audiences.

Q: I noticed there were two or three lawyers named in the credits. Is that due to the likelihood that there would be lawsuits?
ABL: No, it’s a function of being really, really poor. The project took several years and legal work was done pro bono at different times by different people.

Q: The real mystery is the mother. She’s so convincing. It’s very very hard to believe that she is lying. What was the parents’ relationship to one another like?
ABL: I’m sort of new to this kind of film, and.this is delicate. You might say I’m in the hands of publicists on this. And really, I don’t want to speculate on things I don’t know. I went over and over it in my mind. If you conclude--as I do--that the mother seemed very trustworthy, in order for her not to know ... she has to come home 25 times and the paintings turned miraculously from one thing to another. Since the film came out, the Olmsteds haven’t attacked me. We have a weird sort of amicableness. But they are firm in their critique of the film. I showed Laura scenes she never saw before, I thought she would change--but the opposite is true.

Q: Have they said what the criticism is?
ABL: No. Well, they feel betrayed by my doubt. Laura subjected me to a quiz. She showed me paintings and asked, ‘which do you think we have footage of from beginning to end?’ I guessed wrong, in fact. I chose one that seemed childlike, but in fact one that was nicer was documented. They made a public statement that was sent to Sundance, which is fine. We told them that they could do the press tour, put whatever they wanted on the DVD. They didn’t.
Q: Why not?
ABL: They don’t want to promote the movie. We offered to let them do an entire DVD commentary.

Q: When the realist artist was being hounded by the photographer, it seemed a little over the top.
ABL: The guy who hounded him--it was the cable access guy--is just a muckraker. I filmed it off the screen, and I think he will sue me. He says I told him it was a student film; I never told him that. He wants some money out of it.

Q: It doesn’t appear that the parents are spending the money that came from this.
ABL: I don’t think they’re disingenuous. I think-- I’m sure that any money went into the college fund for Marla. It wasn’t about money. I don’t think they’re greedy at all.

My Kid Could Paint That opens in New York and Los Angeles on October 5 and later this month or early in November in the Washington, DC area.



Q&A With Tony Gilroy, Director of Michael Clayton

This audience Q&A took place at Loew's Georgetown Theater on September 29, following the screening of Michael Gilroy. DC Film Society's Director Michael Kyrioglou moderated.

Michael Clayton was written and directed by Tony Gilroy. George Clooney stars as Michael Clayton, a "fixer" at a top Manhattan law firm. According to the press notes, the original inspiration for the film came to Gilroy during visits to New York law firms while researching for the screenplay of The Devil's Advocate. He said, "Wandering through these giant New York law offices, I was struck by how much goes on behind the scenes. Every firm had vast, back-of-the-house departments running twenty-four hours a day to keep them afloat." He said, "I wanted to know what kind of person is up at four o'clock in the morning protecting the firm. Who fills those gaps and makes those calls? What else do they have to do? How far could that go? What would it do to you to have that job? The answer to those questions turned into Michael Clayton."

Michael Kyriouglou: You have had a long screenwriting career but this is your first directing gig. What was the transition like going from writing to directing? Did you always have this in mind?
Tony Gilroy: I wrote this to direct it. I've been sitting in a room writing for 20 years now. Most screenwriters have frustrations that build up after a while. I've had all kinds of experiences, great experiences, really horrifying experiences. You wake up one day and say I'd like to see what happens if I do it myself.

MK: Did writing for film prepare you for directing?
TG: Yes. I learned a tremendous amount; I've had every variety of experience. There were films I had nothing to do with beforehand and came in to fix a film in trouble. I've spent a lot of time on film sets and have seen the process from cradle to grave.

MK: Did anything strike you about directing a film?
TG: Ten years ago I decided to try to do this. It would have been easier to do an action film, or a horror film, any number of other films would have been easier to do. After I wrote this, I really hung onto it, kept it for myself. I wanted to do this one for a number of reasons: there was a personal connection, it was New York, I'd waited so long to do one. Also, I wanted my first movie to be something simple production-wise.

MK: Other filmmakers were involved. Did Steven Soderbergh and Sydney Pollack help?
TG: They were the complete security blanket. They had final cut and made sure I had everything I needed. They created the ideal circumstance for me--probably what they wanted when they made their first film: complete autonomy, perfection, a safe place for me to exactly what I wanted to do.

Question: How to you pitch a screenplay?
TG: I made a decision years ago to stop writing screenplays that didn't get made. I made a really conscious decision to not work with directors. Writing for directors is a really poor percentage play for screenwriters. I've never really pitched to a director. The pitch for this movie was sketchy: 'I want to do a movie about a lawyer that has nothing to do with a courtroom; I want to do the back of the house of a law firm that nobody ever goes to--it's very unglamorized, it will have a movie star part, and someone will die.' If you're a director and I write a movie for you, by the time I finish the script, you're bored with it, or someone else offers $8 million dollars to do something else, or you only do one movie every two years, you don't want to let someone else do it, etc. It's a death trap. I don't do it.

Q: How do you navigate through the numeous characters in the film?
TG: Michael Clayton called that for a reason. There isn't one thing in the film that doesn't reference him in some way. By the time I go to write a script, by the time I'm finished sketching and gathering information beforehand, I pretty much have a clear idea of what it's about, either intuitively or directly.

Q: What is the meaning of in the scene with the three horses? Was this a metaphor or was there a purpose of the three horses?
TG: I've been on the road for the last month with the film, and have heard the most extraordinary, insightful, creative, amazing interpretations of that field scene in such great variety that I don't want to go anyway near anyone's interpretation of it. Whatever you thought, that's right. I don't want to go near it. Audiences work so hard to fill in the blanks and make things work. So I don't want to get in the way of any great interpretations.

MK: The family scenes had some amazing authenticity to them, e.g. the father's birthday scene. The pressnotes mention that some of the locations are from your family's background.
TG: The house where the father lives is 500 yards from the bedroom that I grew up in and where my parents still live. It's an unusual town; lots of cops and firemen live there (Previously there was a law that cops had to live within 60 miles of the city). The field scene ended up being a field 5 miles from where I grew up. It was a mythic high school hang out. When we decided to shoot there we used cover sets. We could only shoot those scenes 5 minutes in the morning and 5 minutes at night. You have no idea how surreal it is to bring George Clooney to your home town to make a movie for five days--truly bizarre.

Q: What is the name of the town?
TG: Washingtonville in Orange County, New York.

Q: What is it like to direct Sydney Pollack and George Clooney?
TG: Most directors are terrified of actors. By and large, acting is completely mystical to everybody. It's spooky. Directors don't want to admit how spooky it is. You have to cast well, have a good script and tell people where they are. When George Clooney and Sydney Pollack showed up, they didn't want to think about directing, they are both extremely competent actors. They wanted what other every other actor want--they wanted to feel they had space to do their work, that I would pick the right pace, that they would feel comfortable and know where they were. After that, I just had to get out of their way.

Q: Were they your first choices?
TG: George was the grand prize. I chased him for 4 or 5 years before he even agreed to meet me. Sydney was a producer and he wanted to direct the movie. But even if he had not been a producer I would have chased him as an actor. We didn't rehearse this movie at all and one of my major goals was to keep George as uncomfortable as possible. Every day when he showed up I'd throw another great New York actor at him. And I need someone like Sydney's character who was really intimidating. Which character takes the scene? George's character doesn't take many scenes in the movie, except in the last scene with Tilda. In the scenes he did with Sydney, Sydney kicks his ass in every scene. I needed an actor who had the authority to kick his ass.

Q: Was the flashback your intention from the beginning?
TG: I had that hit-and-run scene very early on. I needed the audience to see what he does. How can I have it at the end and the beginning? I sketched it in and over time it proved itself that it wanted to be that way. I'm really asking the audience to hang in with me for a half an hour to 45 minutes.

Q: How did you pick Tom Wilkinson and Tilda Swinton?
TG: Tom Wilkinson was a first choice from the beginning. The opportunity for bad behavior is huge so I needed someone who was intelligent and restrained. What is hard about that part is you only see him in the after. He has a whole life that was before. If you had seen his character six months earlier he would be the villain of the movie. So you need someone who can carry the over and give you glimpses of the before. I needed someone who was sweet, someone you could have affection for. Tilda was cast primarily because the part is so lonely and by herself all the time. Most of the work she does is alone; she is fascinating to watch. Then I met her and she's one of the coolest people--so brave; she would do anything.

Q: Did you always have a woman in mind for the role of Tilda Swinton?
TG: It was always about work. Everyone is pretending; everyone is fronting. Social behavior is about pretending to be what you think you should be. Many of her scenes are the type of scene you usually leave out. I'm trying to catch the moment when people make decisions where you can see the nuance to character.

Q: Did you always want to be a writer?
TG: I came in sideways. My father was a writer; I had already been a musician earlier. I didn't start to write until my mid-20s. It took be five years to figure out how to write a screenplay.

Michael Clayton opens on October 5.



The 35th Annual Telluride Film Festival

By Nancy Granese, DC Film Society Member

Last year, Telluride Film Festival founders Bill and Stella Pence turned over their responsibilities to co-director Tom Luddy and Gary Meyer, the Berkeley-based co-founder of the Landmark theater chain. Stella Pence was replaced as managing Director by Julie Huntsinger, another West Coaster. The newcomers chose as Guest Director Edith Kramer, a longtime director of the Pacific Film Archive. The Pences took an Alaskan cruise during TFF to let the new directors run “Film” in their own way. Judging by gripes from long-time TFF attendees, the new programming – which I found less troublesome than did others – was too heavily skewed toward “subtitled movies,” as one disgruntled line sitter observed, with fewer highly anticipated (read “hyped”) films on the agenda.

Admittedly, there were a lot of Asian films, and one of this year’s honorees, Shyam Benegal, is an Indian filmmaker whose films have never been commercially released in the United States, which strikes me as nicely obscure. On the other hand, there’s been no shortage of “subtitled movies”at TFF in past years, either, and some of them have been nearly perfect films, last year’s The Lives of Others being a case in point.

I think the real basis behind the griping this year was around the festival’s continuing difficulty in guaranteeing the low-dollar passholders the ability to see films they’re supposed to be able to see. This year’s festival sold a much greater number of “Patron” passes – $3500 and up – and that meant that some who paid only $625 or $340 could be found waiting in line for an hour and still be frozen out of a showing to which they had been promised entry. Not a pretty picture. The solution seems to be to eliminate the low-dollar passes, but that might not go over very well for a festival that sells itself as a place for true film aficionados since even media has to pay to attend – but media is more likely to be able to afford the high dollar tickets.

It remains to be seen whether the problem can be resolved by next year, if ever. On to the films…

In the last few years, TFF has showcased not just Oscar contenders, but Oscar winners – Brokeback Mountain, The Lives of Others, Walk the Line, etc. But while there were several outstanding performances likely to be remembered at Oscar time, none of the films themselves struck me as surefire Oscar nominees. No single film blew me away – or anyone else for that matter – but there were several very good films and no dogs that should be avoided at all costs. Or at least, none that I saw.

The movie that will get the widest attention, I’d guess, and likely several Oscar nods, would be Into the Wild, which is just opening in DC and around the country. It was a big hit at TFF and for good reason. Directed by Sean Penn, it’s a wonderful film of the problematic book of the same name by Jon Krakauer. I found the book, which I read when it was published about ten years ago, depressing and grim. Others apparently saw the story Penn has filmed, about a young man’s search for himself, which inadvertently ends in tragedy. Whatever one may have thought of the book, the film is very good and well worth seeing.

As one would expect about a film in which yearning for Alaska is a driving trope plays an important role, the photography is first rate, and the scenery gorgeous, but the core travelogue in this film is about a young man’s inner journey. Chris McCandless is clearly a troubled, narcissistic, dishonest, and exasperating young man, yet as portrayed by Emile Hirsch, he’s charming, engaging, loveable and appealing. You enjoy the film because Hirsch makes McCandless’ journey worth sharing. He’s at the center of the film at every moment, and yet his performance dominates the film. He underplays, rather than the opposite, and it’s very effective.

Equally pitch-perfect performances are given by everyone else in the film. Catherine Keener, Hal Holbrook and a novice actor named Brian Dierker have wonderful small roles in McCandless’ life. My favorite, though, is the always fabulous Vince Vaughn as a Dakota farmer who takes Chris in and tries to help him settle down. You can’t believe how hilarious and yet warm Vaughn is. He doesn’t really play a character all that different from the wild and crazy guys he’s done before, but this time there’s a depth and a presence that hasn’t been there previously. He certainly deserves whatever accolades come his way this time around.

On the other end of the mixed-up-youth spectrum, there is a very funny, almost screwball, comedy--Juno, another crowd pleaser at the Festival. Directed by Jason Reitman, who, as the son of Ivan Reitman, visited his first film set when he was 11 days old, this is one of those movies that still has an independent feel even though it’s a Fox Searchlight film. Reitman gave Fox Searchlight high praise, describing the studio as “my creative partner” in the film, although Reitman had two other creative partners of an importance at least equal to that of Fox.

The first, a seemingly young woman named Diablo Cody, wrote the very funny – laugh-out-loud-I-missed-a-lot-of-the-dialogue – script. (Or maybe not so young: read her bizarre biography at
IMDB.com. It involves past careers as a stripper and phone sex operator – which doesn’t quite track with her youthful appearance and leads one to wonder how legit the bio truly is. You make the call.) Cody worked on the script for two years. It sold immediately and Reitman jumped at the opportunity to direct.

The second indispensable creative partner is truly a youngster, the now 20-year-old Ellen Page, who gives a terrific and endearing performance in the title role. She is the teenager you want to strangle, but simply cannot because life would be unbearable without her – she’s a lunatic, way too smart for her own good, and yet, in most situations she’s probably the smartest, the most aware, person in the room.

From the outset, with partially animated credits (à la A Scanner Darkly) to the touching final shot (held a bit too long in the print we saw, but they may not have yet had time to add the closing credits), Juno is filled with hilarious dialogue delivered at a breathtaking pace by a pitch-perfect cast including Jason Batemen, Jennifer Garner, Allison Janney and J.K. Simmons. Cody’s script turns a trite subject – teenage pregnancy – into a funny, touching vehicle. Female bonding, intergenerational friendship, the unreliability of some men and the rock-solid dependability of others, and the unpredictability of humans in general are all examined with a trenchant humor that makes an otherwise small film one of great joy. You’ll laugh, you’ll cry, and all those good things, and you’ll definitely enjoy it.

To many people, Bob Dylan today looks like a re-heated version of Vincent Price, a 50’s film actor who built a career playing vampires and other ghouls. In the 60’s Dylan was one of several Pied Pipers for flower children and political activists alike. Todd Haynes’ often incomprehensible I’m Not There will give you a sense of the absolute drivel that sometimes passed for art at that time (ever see any Andy Warhol flick?). On the other hand, it does have some very strong moments and performances.

Haynes’ film was described in the TFF brochure as “a Finnegan’s Wake-like meditation” and from what I remember of that book, it seems an apt reference. The script is occasionally very clever (“You know Brian Jones, he’s with that great cover band.”) but more often obscure – was that scene in the garden an homage to or Shakespeare?

The film surveys segments of Dylan’s life and career with six actors playing Dylan or Dylan surrogates. The film opens with an interview with nineteenth century French poet Arthur Rimbaud (Ben Wishaw) for reasons that escaped me then and escape me now. Then there’s Richard Gere as a 60-something Billy-the-Kid in hiding perhaps meant to parallel the period when Dylan went underground after a severe motorcycle accident; then again, maybe not. A very talented young (not more than 15) African-American actor named Marcus Carl Franklin plays a youngster who calls himself Woody Guthrie and rides freight trains in the mid-50s. And his connection to Dylan would be…? Did Dylan ride the rails? Did he think he was Woody Guthrie? It’s all a surrealistic muddle, but I have to admit, I kind of liked the film. A lot. I want to see it again. Maybe it’ll make sense next time.

The primary reason to see the film is the extraordinary Cate Blanchett as, you guessed it, Bob Dylan, aka Jude. She’s got to get an Oscar nomination out of this; she’s the best thing in the film and she is Dylan at his peak. She has his mannerisms, his voice, his hunched walk, his confusion about his success, down. She’s amazing.

The whole thing is much easier to follow if one has some idea of the course of Bob Dylan’s career, so try to see the 2005 Martin Scorsese documentary, No Direction Home: Bob Dylan before you take in I’m Not There. Clearly Haynes and Blanchett did.

Werner Herzog has filmed a lot of interesting movies in a lot of interesting places – in fact on every continent – and now he’s made a documentary about the people who move to Antarctica, Encounters at the End of the World, and he’s found a lot of interesting people there. Several seem completely nuts, and others seem to be genetic wanderers, but most are scientists, literally looking for life’s secrets. The film is still a work in progress, and a lot of the under-the-ice shots are things you’ve seen before, perhaps in the wonderful HDTV program Planet Earth or in any of several Shackelton documentaries. But you’ve never seen the plumber who’s directly descended from the ancient Aztec royal family, or the linguist doing research on a continent with no language, or the woman who entertains her colleagues by being zipped into a carry-on bag. Maybe you don’t want to, but you might enjoy visiting them for 98 minutes, though perhaps not for endless dark days and nights.

It’s always interesting that the Holocaust still inspires filmmakers; you’d think nothing more could be said about it and those who ran it, suffered from it, defended it or destroyed it. But a trio of very fine Holocaust-related films were shown at TFF this year and I recommend every one of them.

The fictionalized Austrian/German film, The Counterfeiters, is about something called Project Bernhard, the brainchild of Bernhard Kruger, an SS officer who decided that one way to bring down the Allied Powers was to flood their economies with bogus currency. And, ever efficient, the Nazis decided to use the free labor of imprisoned Jews – experienced counterfeiters, artists, printers, and the like – to man the project. They were rounded up, given the cast-off clothing of gassed victims, a fully-equipped workshop, and set to work. They had ping-pong tables, and good food, and nice music so they could whistle while they worked. In truth, their lives were just as precarious as the poor souls tortured just beyond their barrack walls in Sachsenhausen, the concentration camp primarily for political prisoners, just outside Berlin.

The lead counterfeiter, a Russian Jew named Salomon Sorowitsch (Karl Markovics), tries to keep his band alive and functioning while his efforts are simultaneously being undermined by Adolph Burger (August Diehl), a Communist who doesn’t want anything to do with helping the German war effort. That’s the major arc of the story, but the many small details are just as painful to watch as in any other film.

In addition to forging money, for example, the counterfeiters forge papers and passports. The passports are not very good and Sorowitsch insists on better quality materials, ideally the real thing that would only need to be altered, not constructed from scratch. Next day, a trunk full of passports is delivered, passports taken from those headed to the gas chambers. And sure enough, one man finds the passports of his children among the hundreds in that trunk. In production notes, the film’s director writes that the passport story is true – Burger was still alive at the time the film was made and served as an advisor – as were other personal anecdotes, including that of the SS commander who had Sorowitsch provide him and his family with papers proving that they were Jews, so that they would be safe once the Allies arrived. It’s an appalling story, well told.

Equally appalling is My Enemy’s Enemy, a documentary about Klaus Barbie, “the Butcher of Lyon” and the role played by the rest of the world in allowing him to escape and later to thrive in Bolivia after World War II. Barbie, as a case in point, used the name of his hometown’s rabbi in escaping after the war. When the Americans captured him, they got all the information they could about Communist activity in Europe, because after all, the Nazis knew more about the Communists than anyone else, and then Barbie managed to “escape” US custody. He was recaptured by the British, but he escaped again, this time through Italy, settling in South America.

There he lived more or less openly until the 1980’s when a new government expelled him and the French finally took him back for trial. In that time period, he headed Bolivia’s merchant marine – a lucrative enterprise for a landlocked nation – which was financed in part by Bernhard Kruger, he of counterfeiting fame, by then a Swiss citizen. The film covers everyone’s equivocal behavior – French politicians who collaborated with the wartime Vichy government, unrepentant CIA handlers, complicit Bolivians – and it’s not a pretty picture. But it is compelling filmmaking, particularly the contrast between a now middle-aged survivor of Barbie’s wartime reign over Lyon who is haunted by the thought of playmates who disappeared, and Barbie’s daughter, as creepy an apologist as I’ve ever seen.

The climax of My Enemy’s Enemy is Barbie’s trial in Lyon. The city built a special courtroom – a stage set, actually – and it was packed day after day as people heard tearful recountings of his many cruelties. Onlookers also heard the mellifluous – there’s just no other word to describe them – tones of Barbie’s lawyer, a brilliant half-French, half-Vietnamese man who specializes in political representations.

Terror’s Advocate is the story of Jacques Vergès, and it’s as frightening a film as anything you’ve ever seen. It starts out innocuously enough with Vergès supporting the Algerian independence movement, even though they plant bombs in bars and restaurant in the city of Algiers in the mid-50s to drive out the French colonial masters. (If you haven’t seen Gillo Pontecorvo’s astonishing 1966 film, The Battle of Algiers, you must do so. It had a brief theatrical re-release last year and is now on DVD. Don’t miss it.) Ultimately the strategy worked and the French left, but several the perpetrators were tried while the French were still in charge. Vergès became a hero for defending a woman who was later released due to relentless public pressure. Vergès points out that the Algerian terrorists were supported by the indigenous population, and he therefore thinks they’re not terrorists. Fair enough, but Vergès proceeds to defend Pol Pot, accused of mass murders in Cambodia in the 70’s, Carlos the Jackal, a notorious kidnapper-assassin, who figured out that he could make a lot of money by hijacking planes and did so with abandon throughout the 70s, and in fact, a American friend of mine was murdered in an El Al hijacking masterminded by Carlos.

Vergès provided director Barbet Schroeder with extensive interviews. Like all egomaniacs, he expected the film to so extol his skills that viewers would be swept away by his virtuosity and brilliance. Instead, the film is a savage depiction of a man with no moral center, no real commitment to justice. He lives extremely well, in a study filled with elaborate chess sets. He’s plump and smug. He gives the adversarial legal system a very bad name, and as one moviegoer commented on the way out of the theater, “that guy’s not a lawyer, he’s a bagman for terrorists.” Indeed.

Two affecting films based on books widely known in Europe, The Diving Bell and the Butterfly and And When Did You Last See Your Father?, were Festival highlights. Both are stories of difficult family relationships, but neither is depressing or sentimentally goopy.

Diving Bell is based on the unusual very short book/memoir written by Jean-Dominique Bauby, the onetime editor of French Elle, one of the powerhouse magazines in the fashion universe. (I recommend the book – the length of an article in any New Yorker – which is readily available at Amazon.com.) In his early 40s, Bauby suffered a stroke which resulted in “locked-in syndrome.” He could see, hear and think, but could not move or speak. The film won the Cannes’ Director’s prize for American painter and sometime filmmaker, Julian Schnabel, but that wasn’t necessarily a good thing in my mind, the French often falling in love with talent that is far less obvious to this American. But this time, one can heartily agree with the choice.

Perhaps only a painter could make a successful film – a moving picture, after all – with an immobilized protagonist. At least the man’s mind remained active and engaged throughout a difficult illness where treatment is largely a matter of “let’s see if this works.” It’s a mesmerizing film. The story is engaging – one cannot help identifying with Bauby and his frustration – largely because it’s so unexpected and because Mathieu Amalric’s voiceover performance is excellent. Except for brief, occasional flashbacks to his prior life, the entire film is shown from Bauby’s view – inside the diving bell of the title – and it works very very well.

One final note: the process of watching Dauby “dictate” his book to an exceedingly patient assistant is difficult to watch because it is such a tedious process: she recites the French alphabet, with the letters reordered to reflect frequency of use, and waits for him to blink. What alleviates the tedium is watching his friends and family try to communicate with him using the same technique in incidents that are often amusing, and occasionally painfully sad. A very worthwhile film.

And When Did You Last See Your Father? is completely different from Diving Bell. In many ways a traditional father-son relationship film, it transcends the genre because of stellar performances from Jim Broadbent and Colin Firth. Based on the awkwardly titled reminiscence by English poet Blake Morrison, the book, like Diving Bell, is deeply loved in its native country, but far less well known elsewhere. (It, too, can be found on Amazon.) It came out the same year as Nick Hornby’s very fine Fever Pitch, another reminiscence of a difficult father-son relationship. Hornby’s book got the greater attention – it was immediately made into a very good small film starring… Colin Firth. (Much better than the transplanted Jimmy Fallon-Boston Red Sox version.) So the Morrison book languished. All too frequently, a film is made – or not made – on the whim of a single individual. In this case, Broadbent’s commitment got this film off the ground for a shockingly low budget – of £4 million, but the film’s director, Anand Tucker, has still made a film that cuts no corners.

Tucker, who also directed the wonderful Hilary and Jackie and the not-so-wonderful Shop Girl, does a largely workmanlike job of translating the book to film. Except for a few too many mirror shots, which the director described as (1) “pseudo-pretentions-doesn’t-really-know-who-he-is-film-school-level-frames”; (2) inspired by Wong Kar Wai; and (3) a way to get extra shots in a six-week shoot without having to set up the camera again, it’s a visually straightforward film.

Nonetheless it is tremendously moving, even touching, as one would expect with actors like Broadbent and Firth in the leading roles. We’ve all been embarrassed by our parents and behaved badly when we should have been on our best behavior. Morrison’s father was a beloved physician – perhaps too beloved and be-loving – whose son both idolized and abhorred him. Broadbent, who is always memorable, creates another complex and unforgettable character. Apparently Broadbent’s own father was a philandering doctor, a fact that came out during pre-filming discussions led by the director, who said he “hates rehearsing” (One hopes those discussions were filmed for the DVD release.) so he may have been exorcising some personal demons in making the film.

Firth, who once commented that he could become an astronaut and headlines would read, “Darcy Walks on the Moon”, turns in another of his subtle creations that resonates in every scene. The women are also excellent: Juliet Stevenson as Broadbent’s loving wife and Gina McKee as the modern version of the same woman. Essential to making the film work, however, is a young man named Matthew Beard, relatively new to acting, who is terrific as the young, slightly awed Blake who struggles with his father and himself at every moment. Often sullen or despairing, he is still charming. A very fine film.

The least of the films I saw was Rails and Ties, directed by Alison Eastwood, the slight daughter of Clint. The story is a bit far-fetched (okay, one friend called it “preposterous” and that’s probably fair), and it’s maudlin. But the performances are uniformly excellent from the always reliable Marcia Gay Harden (who also plays the mom in Into the Wild) and the always underappreciated Kevin Bacon to 13-year-old Miles Heizer who plays the central character in the film. Rails and Ties is a chick flick and it will definitely make you cry. It’s adequately directed and Bacon is terrific, but there really isn’t much there.

We also saw one very funny short film, Yours Truly, which is an animated, cut-and-paste, film clip goofy film noir take-off with outstanding performances by several dead people, including Humphrey Bogart, Gene Tierney, and Dana Andrews as well as several nifty little plastic cars. The absolute worst thing we saw – perhaps the worst thing I’ve seen ever seen – was one of a series of short films by Mexican directors selected by Tom Luddy, longtime TFF co-director. Several of the films were very good, including an ironic take on mother love (Distinguishing Features by Kenya Márquez) and Ver Llover by Elisa Miller, which won the Cannes’ Palme d’Or for short films. The hateful If I Die Far from You by Roberto Canales (who graciously introduced his film with heartfelt thanks to TFF for the showing as he noted that the film is having a lot of trouble getting shown in Mexico.) is about the ongoing disappearances/murders of women in Ciudad Juarez. He contrasted this horror with the image of the “new” Mexico that is portrayed to the world. While I take the Canales’ point about his government’s hypocrisy in not doing more to stop these outrages, he could have presented his view in a far less egregiously offensive way. Half the audience left the theater during his film and for those of us who sat through its excruciating nine minutes, I can only say, Tom Luddy, what were you thinking?

If You Go
Storekeepers always tell me that there are a lot people from the DC area at in Telluride for the film festival, but I rarely run into them. However, if you want to increase the DC presence at TFF 35, here’s how to do it. The town is not easy to get to, but you’ll love it once you get there.

If you’ve got the time, you can fly to Denver and drive 8 hours to Telluride. It’s a fitfully scenic ride, and some of those two lane roads are a challenge. Another alternative is to change planes in Denver and fly to Montrose where you can take the Telluride Shuttle, which costs a minimum of $270 roundtrip unless you can find some folks to share the ride in which case each additional passenger costs $45. Or you could rent a car and drive 90 minutes from Montrose on two-lane roads often under reconstruction to repair damage from the previous year’s snows. A third option is to fly directly to Telluride, after changing in Denver or Salt Lake City, but be warned – the runway’s about as long as your grandmother’s dining table.

There are several residential renting services; the best known are Resort Quest and Alpine Lodging. You can also troll various online rentals like Craig’s List for places to stay. There are a few small hotels in Telluride, though they book up early. Lodging is more available and more affordable in Mountain Village, the town at the top of one of the mountains overlooking Telluride proper which sits in a narrow box canyon. Check out the Telluride website for more suggestions.

Seeing Movies: You can buy individual tickets to individual films (this year’s ticket price was $20, about where it’s been the past few years), but you won’t get into the theaters until after all pass holders are admitted. There are several levels of passes: Acme $340, Yellow $625, Sponsor, Patron – gold, silver, platinum – which range from $3,500 to, well, the sky’s the limit. Even though all pass holders have precedence over non-pass holders in getting into a theater, Acme and Yellow pass holders are trumped by Sponsors and Patrons. In the six years I’ve been attending, prices for all the passes have increased and the number of high end participants has increased even more. What this means is that even Acme and Yellow pass holders who have been waiting in line to see a film can be shut out if too many Patrons and Sponsors arrive.

Acme and Yellow pass holders get a separate “Wabbit Weservation” – a little piece of colored paper which is collected at the door – for each film shown at the Chuck Jones Theater in Mountain Village. The theater holds 500 people – it’s really a converted convention hall – and is filled for most shows.

Other pass holders can get into any theater if there’s space. By Monday, even Acme pass holders can get into some of the smaller theaters, but Saturday and especially Sunday can be tough. That said, in six years of attending, I’ve never once missed getting into a movie I wanted to see.



We Need to Hear From YOU

We are always looking for film-related material for the Storyboard. Our enthusiastic and well-traveled members have written about their trips to the Cannes Film Festival, London Film Festival, Venice Film Festival, Telluride Film Festival, Toronto Film Festival, Edinburgh Film Festival, the Berlin Film Festival, the Munich Film Festival, and the Locarno Film Festival. We also heard about what it's like being an extra in the movies. Have you gone to an interesting film festival? Have a favorite place to see movies that we aren't covering in the Calendar of Events? Seen a movie that blew you away? Read a film-related book? Gone to a film seminar? Interviewed a director? Taken notes at a Q&A? Read an article about something that didn't make our local news media? Send your contributions to Storyboard and share your stories with the membership. And we sincerely thank all our contributors for this issue of Storyboard.



Calendar of Events

FILMS

American Film Institute Silver Theater
The AFI's 16th Annual Latin American Film Festival, which began last month, continues through the first week of October. See the latest films from all Latin American countries plus Spain and Portugal.

Film historian Foster Hirsch, author of 16 books on film and theater, will introduce a selection of four films directed by Otto Preminger. Hirsch's latest book Otto Preminger: The Man Who Would Be King will be available this October. The films are Advise and Consent, Bunny Lake is Missing, Fallen Angel, and Angel Face.

The 2007 DC Labor Filmfest takes place October 11-17. See below.

For Halloween the AFI shows the original version of The Wicker Man (1973), the 1974 original of The Texas Chain Saw Massacre, and the original version of Nosferatu. Check the website for dates and times.

Other film events at the AFI include the Fifth Annual Mahalia Jackson Birthday Celebration on October 8, and Summercamp (2006) presented by Silverdocs.

Freer Gallery of Art
The Freer takes part in the 2007 DC Asian Pacific American Film Festival with View from a Grain of Sand (Meena Nanji, 2006) from Afghanistan on October 6 at 1:00pm and New Year Baby (Socheata Poeuv, 2006) from Cambodia on October 6 at 3:00pm.

The film series "With Love: New Films from Southeast Asia" concludes in October. Remaining films are Love Conquers All (Tan Chui-Mui, 2006) from Malaysia on October 12 at 7:00pm, Before We Fall in Love Again (James Lee, 2006) from Malaysia on October 14 at 2:00pm, Village People Radio Show (Amir Muhammad, 2007) from Malaysia on October 26 at 7:00pm, and Singapore Dreaming (Woo Yen Yen and Colin Goh, 2006) from Singapore on October 28 at 2:00pm. Both directors will attend.

National Gallery of Art
"Scenes from a Life: Ingmar Bergman" is a series of three recent films focusing on director Ingmar Bergman who died this year. Saraband (Ingmar Bergman, 2003) is on October 6 at 2:00pm, Bergman Island (Marie Nyrerod, 2006) is on October 6 at 4:30pm, and Sunday's Children (Daniel Bergman, 1992) is on October 7 at 4:00pm.

"Aaron Copland: Music for American Movies" takes place on October 13. At 2:00pm is Of Mice and Men (Lewis Milestone, 1939) shown with The Summington Story (1945) introduced by Copland scholar Neil Lerner. At 4:30pm is The North Star (Lewis Milestone, 1943).

"Edward Hopper and American Movie Culture" is a presentation of three programs of discussions and screenings exploring a range of intersections between Edward Hopper and American cinema. On October 20 at 2:00pm is "Robert Altman, Edward Hopper, and the Spaces of Time," a discussion by film historian Robert Kolker, followed by Robert Altman's Short Cuts (1993). On October 27 at 12:30pm is "New York-Hollywood: Art, Culture and Commerce in the 1930s," a lecture by David Gariff, followed by Deadline at Dawn (Harold Clurman, 1946). More in November.

Other art film and events in October include Other People's Pictures (Lorca Shepperd and Cabot Philbrick, 2004), a documentary on the collectors of amateur snapshots on October 11, 12, 18, and 19 at 1:00pm. On October 14 at 4:30pm is Wisconsin Death Trip: How a Town in Wisconsin Went Mad (James March, 1999) shown in conjunction with the exhibition "The Art of the American Snapshot, 1888-1978." On October 21 at 4:00pm is the "French Short Film Festival," a selection of French shorts from the Cannes Film Festival and the annual Clermont-Ferrand Short Film Festival. On October 27 at 3:00pm is In the Beginning Was the Image: Conversations with Peter Whitehead.

Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden
On October 4 at 11:00am and 1:00pm is a selection of short films by Mircea Cantor including The Landscape is Changing (2003), Double Heads Matches (2002) and Zooooooom (2006). On October 11 at 8:00pm is A Walk in the Sea: Danny Williams and the Warhol Factory (Esther Robinson, 2007) about the filmmaker's uncle Danny Williams and his work with Andy Warhol. On October 18 at 8:00pm is Operation Filmmaker (Nina Davenport, 2007) with the filmmaker present to introduce the film. On October 25 at 8:00pm is 8-Bit (Justin Strawhand, 2005) about the impact of the 8-bit microprocessor, introduced by the filmmaker.

National Museum of African Art
On October 20 at 2:00pm is Desert Odyssey (2001), a documentary about the Tuareg's trans-Saharan camel treks.

National Museum of the American Indian
On October 5 at 7:00pm is The Men of Hula (Lisette Marie Flanary, 2006) a documentary about legendary hula teacher Robert Cazimero.

National Portrait Gallery
On October 16 at 7:00pm is Syriana (Stephen Gaghan, 2005), a thriller inspired by the experiences of former CIA case officer Robert Baer, who will be present for discussion. Tickets must be ordered in advance.

Smithsonian American Art Museum
On October 11 at 5:30pm is The Drama of St. George Street, a documentary on the life of American artist Earl Cunningham. On October 13 at 3:00pm is Vito Acconci: The Red Tapes, (Vito Acconci, 1976) a three-part autobiographical reflection. On October 18 at 6:00pm is "Gary Hill: Word and Image," a program of short videos by Gary Hill including Incidence of Catastrophe (1987) and Why Do Things Get in a Muddle? (1984).

National Museum of Women in the Arts
On October 2 at 12:00noon is Yvon Rainer's Lives of Performers (1972) which follows the lives of dancers preparing to perform a work choreographed by Rainer. On October 4 at 12:00noon is Nightcleaners (1970), a documentary about the campaign to unionize women working as cleaners in British office buildings. On October 8 at 12:00noon and October 23 at 6:30pm is Ulrike Ottinger's Madame X (1977), a pirate tale with an all-female cast. On October 11 at 12:00noon is Chantal Akerman's Je, Tu, Il, Elle (1974). On October 15 at 12:00noon is Yvonne Rainer's About a Woman Who... (1974). On October 30 at 6:30pm is Jeanne Dielman (Chantal Akerman, 1975). For the "Sisters in Cinema" series, Beverly Lindsay-Johnson's Dance Party: The Teenarama Story, an Emmy-winning documentary about the popularity of 1950s and 60s teen dance television shows, including interviews with James Brown, Jerry Butler, and other dancers and participants. Several "teenarama" regulars will join the director for discussion.

Films on the Hill
On October 17 at 7:00pm is one of the great romantic silent fantasies The Enchanted Cottage (John S. Robertson, 1924) starring May McAvoy and Richard Barthelmess. On October 24 at 7:00pm is a program of "Laurel and Hardy Go to Prison" including the boys' first feature film Pardon Us (James Parrott, 1931) and the two-reeler The Hoose Gow (1929) plus a "surprise" short. For Halloween is a "mad doctors" double feature on October 27 at 7:00pm: Behind the Mask (John Francis Dillon, 1932) and The Island of Lost Souls (Erle C. Kenton, 1933). On October 31 at 7:00pm is Bela Lugosi in The Human Monster (Walter Summers, 1940).

Washington Jewish Community Center
A two-part series of David Mamet movies begins on October 22 at 7:30pm with Wag the Dog (Barry Levinson, 1997). On October 29 at 7:30pm is State and Main (David Mamet, 2000).

Goethe Institute
In conjunction with "Life and Nothing Else: An Exhibition of Young Afghan Photographers," is a two-part series of films. On October 18 at 6:30pm is a program of short films including The New Afghanistan: Development of a Civil Society (Paul Schwarz), one of three films produced by Schwarz after three weeks of living in Afghanistan, and A Bright Journey (Ghulam Murtaza Tauwkali). A discussion with Ali A. Jalal, J. Alexander Thier and Almut Wieland-Karimi will follow the screenings. On October 22 at 6:30pm is a second evening of short films about Afghanistan; no titles available yet.

"Stories of the Past" is a three-part series beginning with a biography of Martin Luther, the 16th century theologian, Luther (Eric Till, 2003) on October 15 at 6:30pm. On October 29 at 6:30pm is Mother Courage and Her Children (Peter Palizsch and Manfred Wekwerth, 1959), based on the play by Bertold Brecht. The series ends in November.

National Air and Space Museum
On October 13 at 8:00pm is The Wonder of It All, (2007) an award-winning documentary with interviews of seven moonwalkers who talk about their lives and how walking on the moon affected them. Introduced by the film director, Jeffrey Roth. Reservations are required.

National Geographic Society
See below for the "All Roads" Film Festival.

French Embassy
The French Embassy is taking part in "C'est Chic"; check website for titles and dates.

National Archives
In a "Salute to William Wyler" is a new 35mm print of The Big Country (1958). Catherine Wyler will introduce and discuss her father's film on October 18 at 6:00pm. On October 12 at noon is The Zoot Suit Riots (Joseph Tovares, 2001), a documentary about Los Angeles riots in 1942. As part of the "Presidential Film Favorites" series is Quiz Show (Robert Redford, 1994), a favorite of George H.W. Bush.

The Avalon
As part of the "Czech Lions" series is Faithless Games (Michaela Pavlátová, 2003). The Avalon also takes part in "C'est Chic" titles not listed yet.

Smithsonian Associates
On October 28 at 1:00pm is Viva Cuba (Juan Carlos Cremata Malberti, 2007), Cuba's choice for Best Foreign Language Film.

The Smithsonian Associates takes part in "C'est Chic!" a festival of recent French films. See below.



FILM FESTIVALS

Arabian Sights
This year's edition of Arabian Sights, Contemporary Arab Cinema begins October 26 and ends November 4.

C'est Chic, New Films From France
Now in its second year, the DC French Film Festival "C'est Chic!" will show the latest films from France. Locations will include the Embassy of France, Landmark's E Street Theater and the Avalon Theater. Titles available include Asterix and the Vikings (Stefan Fieldmark and Jasper Moller, 2006) on October 14 at 1:00pm; Serko (Joel Farges, 2006) on October 14 at 3:00pm; Fabulous Fables (Heikki Prepula, Fabrice Luang-Vija, and Cecilia Marreiros Marum, 2007) on October 21 at 1:00pm; and The Prince Who Contemplated His Soul (Nacer Khemir, 2006) on October 21 at 3:00pm.

DC Labor Filmfest
The 2007 DC Labor Filmfest takes place October 11-17 at the AFI's Silver Theater. The opening night film is the U.S. premiere of It's a Free World with director Ken Loach in person. A number of other films by Ken Loach are included in the festival--Bread and Roses, Poor Cow, Kes, Land and Freedom, Riff-Raff and Which Side Are You On. Other directors are represented by Hula Girls (a hit at last April's Filmfest DC), Work Hard, Play Hard, Office Space, Our Daily Bread, Outsourced, and Strike. Check the AFI's website for details.

Asian Pacific American Film Festival
The Eighth Annual DC APA Film Festival started September 27 but runs until October 6. You can still see short films, documentaries and features from Asian countries. Check the website for titles and locations.

Reel Affirmations
October 11-20 is the 17th annual "Reel Affirmations" with short films, documentaries and feature films from around the world. Locations include the Lincoln Theater, Landmark's E Street Cinema and the Goethe Institute.

All Roads Film Festival
The All Roads Film Festival (October 4-7), now in its fourth year, showcases a selection of stories from indigenous and underrepresented minority cultures from around the world. On opening night, October 4 at 7:00pm is Super Amigos (Arturo Perez Torres, 2007) from Mexico, about modern-day superheroes fighting for social justice and human rights. On October 4 at 9:00pm is Dol (Hiner Saleem, 2006) from Turkey. on October 5 at 7:00pm is Sonam, The Fortunate One (Ahsan Muzid, 2005) about Himalayan yak herders in a remote region in India. On October 6 at noon is Waban-aki: People from Where the Sun Rises (Alanis Obomsawin, 2006), a portrait of the Abenaki people in Canada. On October 6 at 4:30pm is the D.C. premiere of Four Sheets to the Wind (Sterlin Harjo, 2007) from the U.S., shown with Miss Navajo (Billy Luther, 2007). On October 6 at 7:30pm is Cocalero (Alejandro Landes, 2007), a documentary about Evo Morales, Bolivia's first indigenous president. On October 7 at noon is Enemies of Happiness (Eva Mulvad and Anja Al Erhayem, 2006), a documentary about Malalai Joya who campaigned for parliament in Afghanistan, shown with Gene Boy Came Home (Alanis Obomsawin, 2007), a short film from Canada. On October 7 at 2:00pm is a series of short films from Tonga, New Zealand, Canada, Australia and Ethiopia. On October 7 at 5:00pm is another program of short films from Australia, Finland and Iran.



FILM COURSES

Washington Center for Psychoanalysis
Psychoanalytic Takes on the Cinema 2007-2008 Narrative Disorder: Psychoanalysis and Postmodern Film. These films make use of postmodern forms to represent internal struggles with death and loss, love and creative work. Postmodern films confront us with the challenges of interpreting disordered narratives which, like patients' stories, move back and forth in time, leave puzzling gaps, make mysterious juxtapositions. There are a total of seven films in the series, meeting once a month starting in October 2007 and ending in April 2008.

For October the film is Afterlife (Hirokazu Koreeda, 1998); the group will meet on October 12 at 7:30pm. The location is 6912 Ayr Lane, Bethesda, Maryland at 7:30pm. Sandie Friedman, PhD, is course coordinator. Continuing Education credit is available and DC Film Society members receive the member rate of $250 for the course. The non-credit fee for the course is $175. For more information visit the website or call 202-237-1854.



FILM LECTURES

Smithsonian Resident Associates
On October 30 at 7:00pm for Halloween is "Movie Monsters," an illustrated lecture through the netherworld of movie monsters. Film historian Max Alvarez will be your guide with clips and behind-the-scenes secrets of creature features.



Previous Storyboards

September, 2007
August, 2007
July, 2007
June, 2007
May, 2007
April, 2007
March, 2007
February, 2007
January, 2007
December, 2006
November, 2006
October, 2006


Contact us: Membership
For members only: E-Mailing List Ushers Website Storyboard All Else